Even if that is the case, you probably aren't going to get enough SEXP voting rights if you don't use the suspects. You shouldn't anyway...Just so you guys know, SEXP is based on suspects you face as well as suspects you use.
Incorrect. It has already been established that although you may gain more SEXP from using the suspect, there is an integral part of playing against the suspect that gets counted in the formula. After all, both parties (the user and the opponent) experience opinions about whether the suspect is broken or not, and therefore both matter in the formula calculation. Just because one is perceived to be more important than the other doesn't mean you cannot gain voting rights playing against the suspect moreso than using it yourself.Even if that is the case, you probably aren't going to get enough SEXP voting rights if you don't use the suspects. You shouldn't anyway...
One aspect isn't perceived to be more important, they should be both equally weighed. People should not be able to vote without using the suspect, and similarly they should not be able to vote without facing the suspect (if we can avoid it at least).Incorrect. It has already been established that although you may gain more SEXP from using the suspect, there is an integral part of playing against the suspect that gets counted in the formula. After all, both parties (the user and the opponent) experience opinions about whether the suspect is broken or not, and therefore both matter in the formula calculation. Just because one is perceived to be more important than the other doesn't mean you cannot gain voting rights playing against the suspect moreso than using it yourself.
What the fuck. Swellow and Shiftry are obviously not broken. Saying that they could be claimed to be broken doesn't support your argument, it undermines it.Perhaps you should have nominated it, then. Or maybe if your Dugtrio supported it especially well, you should have nominated Dugtrio. You're using your lack of nomination as an argument... but if what you say is true, I don't think your lack of action was correct.
Define overprepared. Generally, it means one of two things. Either one, it becomes so prepared for one threat that it becomes vulnerable to other threats, in which case that is clearly not a competitive team and not one that would bring consistent success. No one would continue a team that consistently fails like that, so they wouldn't base their suspect experience off of that. Or two, you mean the threat has become "overcentralized", which is not a characteristic.First, because your team is overprepared for Honchkrow so it appears less broken when you play against it.
In which case, who gives a shit if it's allowed or not? If no one uses it it makes no difference.Second, perhaps your opponents' teams were underprepared for supporting Honchkrow for a sweep, or they just didn't know how to use it
If it's broken and one person is abusing, why wouldn't others be abusing it? You would have to actually justify that before you can go into these hypothetical "oh but what if..." scenarios. Second, if one person really is dominating the ladder with that Pokemon, then surely all those other battlers will vote it BL, and the one vote won't make a difference.If you are abusing a Pokemon that you think is broken while no one else is, then it's BL. Pokemon don't have to "do" things to be broken -- if one person uses it and it is broken as all hell, it probably should be BL no matter how many others use it.
That definition is completely circular. "Banning broken Pokemon is good because it leads to a balanced metagame, which is a metagame without broken Pokemon."Balanced metagames are ones without BL or Uber Pokemon in them. It's not a perfect definition and whether it's practically achievable is questionable, but it's certainly a goal with a defined path (i.e. ban all BL Pokemon). Why does it matter? Well, maybe it's just me, but I don't appreciate playing in a metagame with broken Pokemon running rampant. Why do we even have a BL tier and an Uber tier in the first place? The answer to that is the same as the answer to your question. Of course there will always be Pokemon in "top tier UU", but that doesn't stop us from eliminating the "obviously" BL Pokemon. The definition of "obviously" is up for debate, but that's the point of discussion and paragraphs.
You need to consider both sides of the suspect (when you use or when it's used against you) in order for your paragraphs to be accepted (ideally, that is).As a general argument against "You must use a Pokemon to tell if it's broken", remember that in order to vote, you must maintain a somewhat high rating, play a lot of battles, and have faced or used the suspect a certain amount of times. There is no actual reason that even if you have all that exposure to the suspect that you would actually have to use him in order to formulate a valid opinion.
Why would you not use the suspect when you're winning with it? Where is the logic behind that?umbarsc said:Second, if you notice that the suspect sweeps when you use it, but not when it's not used against you, you could, you know, not use the Suspect. The metagame in which a Pokemon isn't allowed and the metagame in which a Pokemon isn't used are identical. This is obviously hyperbolic, but picture an OU in which Mr. Mime is banned. Is it any different to what we currently have? Simply put, it's never been broken when used against you, you have absolutely no incentive to ban it. You gain nothing by banning a Pokemon that people can't sweep you with. And if you really are using it to sweep people, then those people you face will be wanting it banned so your vote doesn't even make a difference.
There is obviously a varying degree of "sweeping easily" then. For example, Shiftry and Honchkrow clearly have different degrees of successful sweeping / destroying teams. While they do the same thing, Honchkrow is simply better at it.umbarsc said:Also consider Pokemon like Agility Empoleon in OU. Obviously not a broken Pokemon, but most people know how easily it can sweep given the opportunity. People have based teams around it and gotten very easy, consistent sweeps, but it's obviously not a broken Pokemon.
Because the metagame isn't balanced. We've been over this.umbarsc said:In which case, who gives a shit if it's allowed or not? If no one uses it it makes no difference.
Really...umbarsc said:If it's broken and one person is abusing, why wouldn't others be abusing it? You would have to actually justify that before you can go into these hypothetical "oh but what if..." scenarios. Second, if one person really is dominating the ladder with that Pokemon, then surely all those other battlers will vote it BL, and the one vote won't make a difference.
It will. Trusting your opponent's to have used it to its utmost highest potential is silly, while at the same time, assuming your opponent's all suck is also silly. You gain a whole new perspective when you personally use it, and it eliminates any biases you may have. That's like, for example, if my whole family hated/doesn't eat bacon, by your logic I wouldn't gain anything by trying it. Good thing I don't follow your logic, otherwise I would be missing out on the awesomeness of bacon!umbarsc said:Second, if you've noticed broken Pokemon running rampant, vote them BL. I've never said you can't, in fact I've said that's exactly why you should vote a Pokemon BL. But if you've been sweeping easily with a Pokemon, that shouldn't tell you anything new that your other experiences haven't.
I thought you needed to have used a Pokemon to tell how broken it is?For example, Shiftry and Honchkrow clearly have different degrees of successful sweeping / destroying teams. While they do the same thing, Honchkrow is simply better at it.
Isn't that your argument? "Maybe your opponents suck at using it", "maybe you haven't been facing people who have been using it".Your whole argument is one big hypothetical "oh but what if". You have been saying "oh but what if your opponent's all suck" and "oh but what if Honchkrow is never used against you" and the like. They are all irrelevant to what is actually happening.
Ok, sure.Lol, i'm trying to bring another discussion here... for nothing, it seems.
All that suspect conversation is boring and it isn't going nowhere.
Let's change the subject, shall we?
Added to that, no dual typing, thus no 4x weakness, instant recovery move, priority, 120 Base STAB, access to WoW, all that on a less agressive metagame.... yeah Arcanine is da pokémon nowadays.Ok, sure.
Who also thinks Arcanine is possibly the most useful pokemon in the metagame, being able to do like, anything. Its flexibility reminds me a lot of Gyarados in OU.
Arcanine doesn't need to sweep. It's other useful qualities definitely out weigh it. It's just a great support pokemon on almost any team.Unfortunately arcanine doesnt have a decent method of boosting its speed/attack like gyarados, and so is unable to sweep teams like gyarados does in ou
No dual typing also means it has no 4x resistances, and its recovery move has low pp and is near useless against hail/sand/rain. Add to that a SR weakness and it doesn't seem as great, does it?Added to that, no dual typing, thus no 4x weakness, instant recovery move, priority, 120 Base STAB, access to WoW, all that on a less agressive metagame.... yeah Arcanine is da pokémon nowadays.
I beg to differ, Quilfish is the most useful Pokemon. Why? Arcanine, Water-Types, Fighting/Ice/Water Resist, and of course movepool. I could go on and on about how damn useful he is but I'm feeling lazy.Who also thinks Arcanine is possibly the most useful pokemon in the metagame, being able to do like, anything.
Lead off with Zam. All offensive set with a Focus Sash. Anything else is rubbish.Let's talk about what the best sets for Rhyperior/Alakazam are and how to make them suck less.
I still back up what I've been saying for the last two months, Su(b)perior and Sub Offensive Alakazam are very effective when given the right support.I don't want to talk about Arcanine, we already know it's utterly sexy. Let's talk about what the best sets for Rhyperior/Alakazam are and how to make them suck less.