What is the Kokoloko tiering method
As I couldn't post in the other thread in time I figure I'll add some stuff since I was part of the original council.
To keep it short, when kokoloko was leading UU he decided in the transition to XY (when Megas became a thing) that it'd be worth it to take a more drastic approach to tiering and get rid of the biggest threats early on to get a balanced meta fast and then follow a strict schedule of retests starting from the highest priority (ie. mons that weren't as broken) to the lowest (ie. stupid sh*t such as Zygarde or Mega Gardevoir). While no stranger to controversy, particularly around Klefki, it did give us a fair few months of a pretty good metagame even if a bit stale.
Realistically the first rounds of bans weren't super different to the radars at the start of SV OU (except we got to be more liberal since we were retesting later), the biggest difference to what could've been done here is that at the time it was conducted all via council votes whereas now with Finch leading there's so much more community involvement so the retests would have to be through suspects but if something like that were to garner support in the future I definitely think it's worth exploring—moreso in OU than in lower tiers, in any case.
Hope this helped!
Edit: I went through the convos to search the first mons we banned lol, I'd voted on Diggersby, Gardevoirite, Staraptor, and Wobbuffet and abstained on Terrak (and only Raptor, Wobb, and Terrak were banned). Definitely not as "scorched earth" as some people called it.