You have no idea how deserved that Sand Attack Pidgeot was.won in 2 ggs gamer sorry for the sand attack pidgeot
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen1pu-2017869801-ewwmpo11cyvw43ds127gbjqxgt6xjsepw
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen1pu-2017880497-tq0podtyksl4x5f0r4f57n0rpklg4icpw
Dude first of all there's no "proof on his (her actually) wall", the only public contact is actually on your wall, started by your opponent, with very clear availability timeframes, to which you responded with a very generic message that basically means "I can do whenever", which barely counts as scheduling.act, opp hasn't responded ''proof on his wall''
on my wall mb,Dude first of all there's no "proof on his (her actually) wall", the only public contact is actually on your wall, started by your opponent, with very clear availability timeframes, to which you responded with a very generic message that basically means "I can do whenever", which barely counts as scheduling.
You then proceeded to post act on a Friday evening, two full days before the deadline, on a user-created tournament that was literally made to get games done/foster metagame progress in an underexplored tier. You're basically showing no intention of playing your games and clearly attempting to fish for an activity win by (badly) sticking the rules by the letter but not in spirit.
This behaviour goes completely against the spirit of tournaments, and especially this one, which has the clear goal of getting games done more than anything. If you don't want to play and just activity fish your way into the next rounds, there's a list of substitutes waiting to take your place who actually want to play their games. Which, by the way, there's nothing stopping Teh and gastlies from doing, considering this is a user-ran tournament.
If I were the host of the tournament and this does indeed not get played, I would never, ever, award an activity win based on these scheduling messages.
Pretty sure it was thisDude first of all there's no "proof on his (her actually) wall", the only public contact is actually on your wall, started by your opponent, with very clear availability timeframes, to which you responded with a very generic message that basically means "I can do whenever", which barely counts as scheduling.
You then proceeded to post act on a Friday evening, two full days before the deadline, on a user-created tournament that was literally made to get games done/foster metagame progress in an underexplored tier. You're basically showing no intention of playing your games and clearly attempting to fish for an activity win by (badly) sticking the rules by the letter but not in spirit.
This behaviour goes completely against the spirit of tournaments, and especially this one, which has the clear goal of getting games done more than anything. If you don't want to play and just activity fish your way into the next rounds, there's a list of substitutes waiting to take your place who actually want to play their games. Which, by the way, there's nothing stopping Teh and gastlies from doing, considering this is a user-ran tournament.
If I were the host of the tournament and this does indeed not get played, I would never, ever, award an activity win based on these scheduling messages.
1. here is the wall proofDude first of all there's no "proof on his (her actually) wall", the only public contact is actually on your wall, started by your opponent, with very clear availability timeframes, to which you responded with a very generic message that basically means "I can do whenever", which barely counts as scheduling.
You then proceeded to post act on a Friday evening, two full days before the deadline, on a user-created tournament that was literally made to get games done/foster metagame progress in an underexplored tier. You're basically showing no intention of playing your games and clearly attempting to fish for an activity win by (badly) sticking the rules by the letter but not in spirit.
This behaviour goes completely against the spirit of tournaments, and especially this one, which has the clear goal of getting games done more than anything. If you don't want to play and just activity fish your way into the next rounds, there's a list of substitutes waiting to take your place who actually want to play their games. Which, by the way, there's nothing stopping Teh and gastlies from doing, considering this is a user-ran tournament.
If I were the host of the tournament and this does indeed not get played, I would never, ever, award an activity win based on these scheduling messages.
Dude, For starters, Yall Never finished scheduling, Second, You said contacted before being in contact, Third, yes its christmas weekend, but you are THE ONLY ONE with this issue.View attachment 583367 1. here is the wall proof
2. it was almost sat
3. its x-mas weekend, like come on, all of the world is busy