-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
(Little) Things that annoy you in Pokémon
- Thread starter BriarRose
- Start date
No thanks, I prefer actually being able to name the character.
Good news!
Games that let you name the character still can have voice acting
They either talk around your name in voiced segments or its present in the text box but not in the spoken dialog
I've complained before, but the way gender choices work in Pokemon will never cease to annoy me. Early games, whatever, you're 8 pixels tall, who cares about limited options. Then XY happened and they allowed actual customization. Which is great, except they then limited your customization choices based on arbitrary gender BS. Guys get only short hair options, girls MUST carry a purse, etc. And that basically continued until Scarlet/Violet, where they eliminated most clothing customization and all skirts, but still used gendered terms of address for the player for basically no reason.
*though the fact that in every generation the girl is more optimal for speedrunning, but it's for a different reason every time, will always make me laugh.
*though the fact that in every generation the girl is more optimal for speedrunning, but it's for a different reason every time, will always make me laugh.
Honestly even ignoring the gendered clothing options, on top of that the options for the guys were just.
nothing
less per style in general, but also the styles selected are not great. You couldn't even wear shorts in XY.
On the clothing subject, I would point that this game is made by a company in the country with the stricter "everyone must dress and look the same" rules for young people.
While not really a excuse (there are other japanese IPs who nail the customization), it's not exactly hard to believe that they do struggle in coming up with ways to make their player characters (expecially male ones) look different.
While not really a excuse (there are other japanese IPs who nail the customization), it's not exactly hard to believe that they do struggle in coming up with ways to make their player characters (expecially male ones) look different.
Oh my you have NO IDEA how much this bothers me. And them being careless even after Dexit is jarring. I understand curating a copypaste of well over 1000 moveset tables ought to be a chore, but, come the fuck on, don't halfass it.
EDIT: Speaking of which, Black and White Kyurem's approach. Scary fucking face turning into Fusion Bolt and Fusion Flare was dumb. Glaciate was the move intended to be a failure at proccing a Fusion move, as you could cleary see in the Pokedex 3D animations. Freeze Shock and Ice Burn were if anything closer to Bolt Strike and Blue Flare in concept. And it is not like trying to learn a move upon form change was new, as Rotom had been doing that since Platinum.
So, yeah, Kyurem is a mess when fusing, move-wise.
I mean the problem with the games is not everyone looks the same. There's actually a ton of clothing options in aggregate across both genders.
My problem is the men clothing are just boring. Which seems less a cultural issue and more shrugging at the idea of men's fashion.
Which to be fair... is a cultural issue (imo). If you've been around other medias (you probably have) you'd notice that one of the common ways to trashtalk asian young males is that they all look / dress the same.
Which while stereotypical isn't exactly that far from the truth.
My point being... I'd not be surprised if GF actually struggles to even come up with "different looking male clothing".
I'm saying that's probably a problem not exclusive to Japan so at some point it ceases to be a cultural issue and more a general design-ethos issue
I personally don't think lack of voice acting is inherently an issue. The series doesn't strictly need it and TPCi would probably half-ass it anyway,
But I do think it's really fucking stupid that Game Freak animated several scenes as if they did have voice acting, such as the SWSH intro. It's really jarring seeing the sweeping cinematography screaming "this is something being narrated over" only to hear text box clicks.
I remember seeing a theory between the initial announcement of SwSh and E3 that there would be voice acting because we hadn't seen a screenshot with a textbox at the time, and I thought "Why would they remove text boxes if it were fully voiced? What happens if a deaf person wants to play?" and sometimes I think they were right for the wrong reasons. Like there was originally supposed to be voice acting and it was taken out (because they thought it wasn't needed and/or wouldn't be good enough like you said) and that's why the intro feels like it should have a voice narrating over it and it doesn't. And the reason the post-SwSh games don't have anything like that was because they decided voice acting (besides the grunts in LA's case) wouldn't work much earlier in development.
In their defense, "we've added voice acting after much fan demand, and since we have that, we've also eliminated all text boxes and equivalents, making our scenery more visible and saving nearly 2 mb of storage space!" is exactly the sort of thing I'd expect of GF.
It kind of annoys me that we still don't have official ingame soundtracks on Spotify. Sometimes I just want to listen to ingame OST such as gym leader and champion battles while jogging or traveling in public transportation. I'm not really a fan of the fanmade soundtracks while listening on YouTube means that I have to keep that app open which is restricting.
My brain probably interpreted the YouTuber differently (that no text boxes would also mean no subtitles) because it sounded "too good to be true" for Pokemon to go from no voice acting to being fully voiced in a single generation and there had to be a catch.Subtitles, how do they work?
This. Rhydon oozed "fully evolved" and "'mon that would have gotten a stat boost and a Mega in XY". Rhyhorn oozed "middle stage". Rhyperior oozes "Mega Rhydon", specially after Mega Aggron became a thing with a very similar design philosophy.
A Rhyhorn preevo could have worked as a Budew, an early game 'mon, an alternative to Geodude; something more workable than Pichu/Cleffa/Igglybuff/Azurill.
And, of course, Mega Nidos would had been awesome.
Pro-Tip: Request the desktop site if your Phone's Browser allows it. I do it on iPhone and it stops the video from pausing/not-playing if you minimize the Browser for other apps (though need something like Control Panel or a Play-Button on Earbuds to start it again). I use it to listen to Podcasts or Game Playlists while playing Pokemon Go on a Park walk or such.
Maybe if Baby Pokémon were treated as their own stage rather than adding up (which makes Baby + 3) then it wouldn’t be an issue for Rhyhorn to get a Baby Pokémon.
Then again, 4-stage is something even GF is unwilling because it can cause a very severe slippery slope, both power-wise and lore-wise.
The issue is giving Rhydon an evolution that literally was a 10 boost to 5 of its stats, to the point a good IV Rhydon has better stats than a bad IV Rhyperior.
And, well, "baby" Pokemon is a meaningless distinction. Elekid had stats beyond that of Pikachu, Munchlax has a stat total comparable to Butterfree, Porygon or Lickitung, Marill has lower stats than most "baby" Pokemon, Ralts has stats comparable to the weaker "baby" Pokemon.
Evolution stages are pretty much nonexistant in the games, beyond the experience yield formula, and, personally, I don't think they should be given importance. It is bloat from the TCG.
EDIT: Megas worked very well with circa-500 BST 'mons, but people unaware of stats turned their nose at "uncomplete families", despite, well, far better mileage than evolutions:
No seriously, plenty of people going "Pinsir and Heracross should have evolved", or "where is the LAPRAS evolution" really grind my Klinks lol
(Or people complaining about Geeta having Gogoat, as it was seen as a weak Pokemon... despite having stats on a fully evolved Grass starter's ballpark)
And, well, "baby" Pokemon is a meaningless distinction. Elekid had stats beyond that of Pikachu, Munchlax has a stat total comparable to Butterfree, Porygon or Lickitung, Marill has lower stats than most "baby" Pokemon, Ralts has stats comparable to the weaker "baby" Pokemon.
Evolution stages are pretty much nonexistant in the games, beyond the experience yield formula, and, personally, I don't think they should be given importance. It is bloat from the TCG.
EDIT: Megas worked very well with circa-500 BST 'mons, but people unaware of stats turned their nose at "uncomplete families", despite, well, far better mileage than evolutions:
No seriously, plenty of people going "Pinsir and Heracross should have evolved", or "where is the LAPRAS evolution" really grind my Klinks lol
(Or people complaining about Geeta having Gogoat, as it was seen as a weak Pokemon... despite having stats on a fully evolved Grass starter's ballpark)
Last edited:
QuentinQuonce
formerly green_typhlosion
Kind of sucks that if you want the dex entry for shiny Meltan in Home (or any other game) you're basically forced to waste one since it can't evolve anywhere except in Go, where it can never return to. Not so much a major issue since if you get a crap shiny in Go you may as well just transfer it, but I hope future games do allow the species to evolve eventually. I suppose if Go ever ceases to exist they'll pretty much have to.