it gets more precise as you battle more often, like any statistic... while you might not see 43 blisseys in 100 battles, you are even less likely to see exactly 4 blisseys in 10 battles you are more likely to see around 430 in 1000 matches.Well, just because there is a for example 43% of Blisseys doesn't mean out of 100 battles I'd see Blissey 43 times. I few that shit that says you have a probability to see something however many times is pointless
The error in your logic is the following: "I'd"Well, just because there is a for example 43% of Blisseys doesn't mean out of 100 battles I'd see Blissey 43 times. I few that shit that says you have a probability to see something however many times is pointless
http://shoddybattle.com/ladder said:The first precaution taken in ladder play is that all matches are against random opponents. It is impossible to arrange a ladder match against an opponent of your choice. Moreover, the system attempts to match you to the player with the conservative rating estimate nearest yours.
Well see, the error in this would be the system ATTEMPTS as I have many many many many many many many many times faced people with way lower ratings than mine. Not to mention, my two most common teams have at least 2 Pokes that are not in the top 42.The error in your logic is the following: "I'd"
No, you may not individually see Blissey in 43 of every 100 battles. What the statistic means is that in 43 of every 100 ladder battles(well technically 43 of every 50 since there are two teams) that occur, Blissey will appear. I think what you are probably have trouble with is that there are some pokemon like Blissey that you probably see much more often at the top of the ladder than at the bottom of the ladder. Teams that use better pokemon are more likely to work their way to the top of the ladder, which influences the teams you run into. Pokemon used in matches with players that have very high ratings are likely a slightly different batch than pokemon used in matches with very low ratings.
Come on, MoP, your anecdotal accounts cannot overcome the actual usage statistics in an argument about usage. You are, in fact, just one person. You have 2 Pokemon in 2 teams (so 2 in 12, or 1/6 of your Pokemon) that are not in the top 42. That to me speaks more for its validity even in this specific case than against it.Well see, the error in this would be the system ATTEMPTS as I have many many many many many many many many times faced people with way lower ratings than mine. Not to mention, my two most common teams have at least 2 Pokes that are not in the top 42.
Also, I fail to see what being at the top or bottom of ranking matters cause I'm sure there are idiots who lose every other match using a bog standard team.
The only way I could see to improve this would be to suppliment it with some sort of usage multiplier based on the person's rating, so that a higher ranked player's team will be weighted more than a lower ranked person's team.
Nope, not even Unaware...I'd use Bibarel on ALL my teams if it had a trait...but for now it can only be on my main one. :(Well, it's about time that Bibarel is given Simple (Unaware was given iirc). I would start using it straight away if that happened. :(
Clefable is surprisingly sturdy, and with access to Wish/Softboiled can take a while to take down.Clefable? WTF? Is that only because of Magic Guard? It's not like it has the defenses to set up. Of course, I've never used Clefable (so it should be NU, then XD), so I might not know better either way.
Magic Gaurd is FREAKING AMAZING. I bet half the pokes in the game wish they could get Magic Gaurd. IMMUNITY from damage from rocks, sandstorm, hail, poison (and therefore toxic spikes), burn (and the ability to actually pick up poison/burn then abuse with STAB'd facade) . . . that's like half the damage sources in the freaking game! (well, it certainly seems that way anyway).Clefable? WTF? Is that only because of Magic Guard? It's not like it has the defenses to set up. Of course, I've never used Clefable (so it should be NU, then XD), so I might not know better either way.
It's nice to see that Spiritomb's being used more often. :D (But quit copying me! lol Who am I kidding? I haven't had that much time to go on Shoddy lately, anyhow. :( )
Don't forget hitmonchan gets the elemental punches, which is a big advantage over the other hitmons IMO...I'm a little surprised to see Electivire is still getting so much use. Don't get me wrong - he's a great Pokemon, I just expected him to go the way of the Rhyperior once the initial hype died down and it became evident that he wasn't actually that great.
Gengar useage is also baffling. Alakazam has faded away into nothingness, mostly due to Weavile and the rest of the Pursuiters. However, Gengar who suffers all the same problems is currently ranked above freakin' Tyranitar. I expect him in the top 15, but not in the top 4.
Also shocked to see that Hitmonlee is used less than the other Hitmons, despite clearly being the best of the bunch.
Very interesting...thanks to all at Shoddy.
I have a feeling that it's because all Hitmonlee can really do is attack since it can't last very long at all. Plus he got left out of GOOD added traits. Limber is good and all, but people want to try out newer things, and Reckless is just bad...Also shocked to see that Hitmonlee is used less than the other Hitmons, despite clearly being the best of the bunch.
That might have something to do with the fact unlike Alakazam Gengar can use almost any type of attack under the sun and still gets neat tricks like Destiny Bond and Hypnosis.However, Gengar who suffers all the same problems is currently ranked above freakin' Tyranitar. I expect him in the top 15, but not in the top 4.