Limitless, Battlulz tends to give into peer pressure a lot, and he was probably worried about what you would think or say if he denied your rematch request. Also, the obvious thing would not be to complain in the thread, because he did not want to ruin your reputation here. Instead he took the private route and PM'd Sonuis about it. I do not think, however, that it was sportsmanlike of you to post in this topic as if he has been trying to avoid you while completely leaving out other parts of the story. That post had a clear malicious intent against Battlulz, when he was trying to keep matters private.I'll just leave it at this.
From your post, KD24:
"i think it would be best to hear from battlulz personally and hear what he has to say. Perhaps he and limitless rescheduled the match to start after the legal time after the disconnection. Or perhaps this was the match that was supposed to count and battlulz sadly disconnected."
As I've stated, we rescheduled for Friday. He didn't have any problem with this, or at least when we talked on AIM. If he had any problem, the obvious thing to do would be to complain in this thread, which was evidential, since he didn't do that.
Lol, hes taking the high road? Really now, that road seemed to have been lowered when he posted acting like Battlulz has been completely inactive. No matter how much of an argument you try to present, its simply called good sportsmanship. Limitless, by how it seems, was going to lose. If good sportsmanship had been shown, he would have just taken his eventual defeat and moved on. If this time limit thing really mattered, Limitless would talk to Sonius and receive the win. In an attempt to rid of his loss, he just asked for a rematch, and Battlulz has pmed Sonius on the issueWhat happened in the battle is irrelevent. Battlulz accepted (and by doing so legitimized) the extra limitation, and according to this limitation he lost.
If the arbitrary limitation agreed upon by both battlers previous to the battle was "No Stealth Rock," for example, and the battler who was winning the entire time decided to use Stealth Rock, he would lose, regardless of how "extremely" he was winning.
A time limitation is the same. Battlulz accepted, and he lost according to that limitation.
By all logic, Limitless should simply accept the win and move on.
However, he is really taking the high road and agreeing to a rematch. Is this really that disagreeable to you?
Actually, if both players agreed to not use Stealth Rock beforehand, and one of them did, I don't think Sonuis would give that person a loss, lol. The tournament host should not be enforcing extra rules that players agree to.What happened in the battle is irrelevent. Battlulz accepted (and by doing so legitimized) the extra limitation, and according to this limitation he lost.
If the arbitrary limitation agreed upon by both battlers previous to the battle was "No Stealth Rock," for example, and the battler who was winning the entire time decided to use Stealth Rock, he would lose, regardless of how "extremely" he was winning.
A time limitation is the same. Battlulz accepted, and he lost according to that limitation.
By all logic, Limitless should simply accept the win and move on.
However, he is really taking the high road and agreeing to a rematch. Is this really that disagreeable to you?
Quit trying to BS this and sound smart....the fact of the matter is....the time limit rule is enforced simply for the ladder so that people don't try and stall time to win. It is irrelevant for tournies, do you seriously check every single clause when you send someone a challenge? It is a given that in tournies timeouts shouldn't matter.What happened in the battle is irrelevent. Battlulz accepted (and by doing so legitimized) the extra limitation, and according to this limitation he lost.
If the arbitrary limitation agreed upon by both battlers previous to the battle was "No Stealth Rock," for example, and the battler who was winning the entire time decided to use Stealth Rock, he would lose, regardless of how "extremely" he was winning.
A time limitation is the same. Battlulz accepted, and he lost according to that limitation.
By all logic, Limitless should simply accept the win and move on.
However, he is really taking the high road and agreeing to a rematch. Is this really that disagreeable to you?
My first reply handles what you meant. So, like I said....disqualify Mekkah for breaking the time out rule.No, you cannot add rules that break the rules lol. I clearly stated ADDITIONAL rules, not rules that break the other rules.
All of you, as collective, are completely daft.
wow, so why is there a ~1.5 page long argument about this again?Limitless said:As I've stated, we rescheduled for Friday. He didn't have any problem with this, or at least when we talked on AIM. If he had any problem, the obvious thing to do would be to complain in this thread, which was evidential, since he didn't do that.
if this is so, then Briann McCann should have advanced over Mekkah, but that wasnt the case, so the same ruling should be applied hereI read the rules and didnt see anything mentioning a time limit. You guys played the match with time limit and when you exhaust your time you lose. Simple. I don't see why you guys are arguing.
Just posting to say I've only been online a couple minutes at a time since I have been stuck studying this weekend. We are only a time zone apart and I'm wide open this weekend, we shouldn't have a problem finding each other to get this done on timeThe real reason I'm posting is to say I made contact with Gaborik during the non-battling portion of the round. Since then I've PM'd him when I've seen him on, but I've been unlucky in that both of those times he's been afk. I'll try to arrange a time.