Finally got shiny growlithe! egg number 238. i will finish this batch then go on to finding shiny phantump :3
first batch: nothing
second: shiny at 238
first batch: nothing
second: shiny at 238
Honestly it should of been made private and controlled by a handful of people it's not that hard to send a PM to one of the "Managers" if there's a few trusted managers with access to it.I'm sorry to say, but at 100k eggs, I think we'll have to stop. There has been a bunch of immature kids over the past day who just seem to be incapable of minding their own business, and think it's funny to mess with our hard work. It's been really annoying, and it's a pain for me to continually go back and fix these ***hole's edits (I just find it really annoying).
So what do we think the real shiny rate most likely is now then? Or are all results on the spreadsheet now BS?Honestly it should of been made private and controlled by a handful of people it's not that hard to send a PM to one of the "Managers" if there's a few trusted managers with access to it.
I don't understand why people do these kinds of things... I'm not even on the list.
All results right now the only ones we can trust are the ones in this thread sadly...
I'm just a random I only view the threads results I rarely even look at the sheetSo what do we think the real shiny rate most likely is now then? Or are all results on the spreadsheet now BS?
Well think about it this way. If the chance of getting a shiny is 1:437 as the sheet says... you doing 1300 eggs is like doing 437 three times.I've MM'd about 1300 eggs without a shiny at this point. One of my parents isn't Kalos bred, so I'm wondering if the hexagon affects shiny rate, because as it stands I've failed a 95% chance to get a shiny.
Actually the probability of at least one success in a certain number of tries with unchanging odds of 1/450 (general estimate) is 1-(1-1/450)^1300, which comes out at around 95%. Without shiny charm it would be around 67%, which is far more consistent with my MM attempts in the past without the shiny charm, and it would make sense that I wouldn't have a shiny yet because there's a chunky 33% chance of failure. Due to the large number of people on the spreadsheet who have reported shinies frequently enough for the 1/450 to be accurate, me being a large outlier on that field of data raises my suspicions that non-kalos parents could affect the shiny rate.Well think about it this way. If the chance of getting a shiny is 1:437 as the sheet says... you doing 1300 eggs is like doing 437 three times.
Essentially, its the same thing as if you flipped a coin 3 times and got tails each time. Its not really that outrageous... just bad luck.
That could be true, but I think there's a whole lot of people who are using 6Iv dittos... pretty much none of those are from kalos.Actually the probability of at least one success in a certain number of tries with unchanging odds of 1/450 (general estimate) is 1-(1-1/450)^1300, which comes out at around 95%. Without shiny charm it would be around 67%, which is far more consistent with my MM attempts in the past without the shiny charm, and it would make sense that I wouldn't have a shiny yet because there's a chunky 33% chance of failure. Due to the large number of people on the spreadsheet who have reported shinies frequently enough for the 1/450 to be accurate, me being a large outlier on that field of data raises my suspicions that non-kalos parents could affect the shiny rate.
Well I've used a 6 IV ditto on 2 pokemon so far and got three shinies I'll probably have a shiny drought with anorith though as my luck with kricketot was pretty... absurd lolThat could be true, but I think there's a whole lot of people who are using 6Iv dittos... pretty much none of those are from kalos.
Just change the editing permissions so that only specific users can make changes. I'm willing work with a few others to keep the spreadsheet updated with other users' posts, although the more people who verify with their email address (and make their own changes), the better.I'm sorry to say, but at 100k eggs, I think we'll have to stop. There has been a bunch of immature kids over the past day who just seem to be incapable of minding their own business, and think it's funny to mess with our hard work. It's been really annoying, and it's a pain for me to continually go back and fix these ***hole's edits (I just find it really annoying).
I'm using a Japanese 6 IV ditto not from Kalos- I had a bad start (only 1 in my first batch of 1,000) I hatched four in my next 1,300 and I'm now right in line with the averageActually the probability of at least one success in a certain number of tries with unchanging odds of 1/450 (general estimate) is 1-(1-1/450)^1300, which comes out at around 95%. Without shiny charm it would be around 67%, which is far more consistent with my MM attempts in the past without the shiny charm, and it would make sense that I wouldn't have a shiny yet because there's a chunky 33% chance of failure. Due to the large number of people on the spreadsheet who have reported shinies frequently enough for the 1/450 to be accurate, me being a large outlier on that field of data raises my suspicions that non-kalos parents could affect the shiny rate.
Same for me. =[Updated post #507 and spreadsheet. ^.^ My odds definitely changed since getting the Shiny Charm... but certainly not in the way I expected. xD