I have never thought of Wikipedia as a news source. What kind of news doesn't allow primary sources?I firmly believe we've reached the stage where Wikipedia is a better news source than the average news website due to its deliberately encyclopediac, unbiased nature
Whether that's more a sign of how good they've gotten at quality control or a commentary on the deplorable state of modern journalism is up for debate
I also don't believe that their nature is unbiased, especially if you're talking about their coverage of current events.