darkie
.
I propose we add a step in the process, entitled 'concept assessment'. Simply put, in the 6 most recent CAPs (all of them), after voting on the concept, we really didn't know what to do next.If you are not an experienced member of the CAP community, it is strongly recommended that you do not post in this thread.
This thread is intended to contain intelligent discussion and commentary by experienced members of the CAP project regarding CAP policy, process, and rules. As such, the content of this thread will be moderated more strictly than other threads on the forum. The posting rules for Policy Review threads are contained here.
In order to make the process as efficient as it can be, before voting on anything that has anything to do with the competitive aspects of the Pokemon, we need to take a step to just 'get with the picture', figure if we are doing the right thing. This would allow the creation process to be streamlined and in effect, create a more cohesive Pokemon. This would be similar to the counters step implemented in CAP 6; it would just be a brief discussion.
As always with PR threads, give your input on the subject. If I am unclear in anyway, just let me know and I will attempt to elaborate.
2/3