You just eat them before you find out what they are. If you like it, then it isn't an issue.How do you people eat those sorts of things? I'm not judging or anything, but just reading about them disgists me..
Oh... I see.jynx: I agree with you halfway on the "British cooking is lazy" thing, but I think actually it's more that Brits are just ignorant about food. It's not that we can't be bothered to season vegetables, it's that we don't know how to. (Also, vegetables tend to be boiled rather than fried or roasted, which means that any seasoning we did add would all just be dissolved in the water anyway rather than absorbed into the vegetables. So bland vegetables are an inherent flaw in the culture.)
)
I've eaten all 6 of these, but I kind of feel guilty for my past for exploiting environmentally un-friendly/ inhumane foods.The "3 Kings" of French-- Caviar, Foie Gras, and Truffles, of which I've only tried the second (which is good!). Sturgeon is the "royal fish" in Europe and the "Imperial fish" in China, but I've heard it's just similar to very fine Carp?? (and Carp is pretty meh as far as fish goes...) Sturgeon's are also falling fast and take forever to become adults, so not something you'd want to promote fishing of...
The "3 Kings" of Chinese-- Swallows Nest, Abalone, and Sharksfin. Abalone, I don't really get what's the big deal (besides it being so expensive...) since it's just another shellfish. Sharksfin tastes AMAYZING for something with almost no flavor, and I can totally appreciate why there's such a huge black market for the stuff (though I'm totally against the over-fishing of sharks). Swallows Nest, definitely something on my to-do list...
Jealous~ I'm thinking Caviar / Sharksfin are the most environmentally unfriendly? I'm not researching, but I can't imagine there being great environmental repercussions to digging up mushrooms or collecting used birds nests. Over fishing is a major problem, and the shark especially is a keystone species group (being an ocean top predator), and one that man has heavily over-fished. I just want to clear up that when I say "got to try" applied to basically any ingredient, I mean under market conditions restricted by protection to enforce environmentally sustainable practices-- yeah, I get that said market conditions don't really exist, and are currently far from realistic in regards to fishing, but I got another 60 or so years to live, I'm not in a rush (and hopefully sharks and sturgeons aren't going extinct any time soon...).I've eaten all 6 of these, but I kind of feel guilty for my past for exploiting environmentally un-friendly/ inhumane foods.
I don't think I would like more of these in the future, not because of taste, but because of the ethics involved.
Guess so, usually eats the oceanic ecosystems that get the most problems because they are very chained together in the food web.Jealous~ I'm thinking Caviar / Sharksfin are the most environmentally unfriendly? I'm not researching, but I can't imagine there being great environmental repercussions to digging up mushrooms or collecting used birds nests. Over fishing is a major problem, and the shark especially is a keystone species group (being an ocean top predator), and one that man has heavily over-fished. I just want to clear up that when I say "got to try" applied to basically any ingredient, I mean under market conditions restricted by protection to enforce environmentally sustainable practices-- yeah, I get that said market conditions don't really exist, and are currently far from realistic in regards to fishing, but I got another 60 or so years to live, I'm not in a rush (and hopefully sharks and sturgeons aren't going extinct any time soon...).
WaterBomb-- good for you mate. I want to have an even more open attitude, but as mentioned, there are some times I can't help but get bored.
Really? Like I understand the cultural differences with regards to what is considered an acceptable source or type of meat between the east and west, but I would be genuinely surprised if most people in the east were completely aware of how sharks are finned and genuinely did not give any shits about it re: it being an inhumane method of farming. The comparison with dogs isn't great since killing dogs for food isn't usually considered cruel per se, just that in the west it's usually considered SUPER HORRIFYING to eat animals that are primarily used as pets. It's not an attitude I agree with, honestly... unless people's pets are literally being stolen to be cooked, but I seriously doubt that's the case. I don't even think this could even be compared to whaling, though the environmental effects are probably similar (I'll admit I don't know much about the cruelty aspects of whaling though). It's just that the whole thing is sort of similar to chopping off the feet and tail of cattle and then leaving them hobbled in a field somewhere to starve to death. Even for people who are happy to eat beef, that sort of shit probably wouldn't fly.I personally only consider the environmental / resource management issues and not the "ethical ones", because the consumers of Sharkfin have an entirely different ethics/cultural background then the west (you're not going to get them/us to change, on that point...).
Most people by now would know what shark finning is. But still continue to have shark fin soup during their celebration.Really? Like I understand the cultural differences with regards to what is considered an acceptable source or type of meat between the east and west, but I would be genuinely surprised if most people in the east were completely aware of how sharks are finned and genuinely did not give any shits about it re: it being an inhumane method of farming. The comparison with dogs isn't great since killing dogs for food isn't usually considered cruel per se, just that in the west it's usually considered SUPER HORRIFYING to eat animals that are primarily used as pets. It's not an attitude I agree with, honestly... unless people's pets are literally being stolen to be cooked, but I seriously doubt that's the case. I don't even think this could even be compared to whaling, though the environmental effects are probably similar (I'll admit I don't know much about the cruelty aspects of whaling though). It's just that the whole thing is sort of similar to chopping off the feet and tail of cattle and then leaving them hobbled in a field somewhere to starve to death. Even for people who are happy to eat beef, that sort of shit probably wouldn't fly.
I guess my main question is do you guys think most people who are living where shark's fin soup is culturally significant don't give a shit about the methods in which they're farmed? Are the methods generally unknown and would probably cause more controversy if people knew, is it considered a necessary evil or is it just more like if someone was beating the shit out of a shark with a bat until it died they wouldn't care because animal cruelty is no big deal and leaving a shark to starve or drown in the bottom of the ocean isn't really cruelty anyway? And to you specifically jynx, which of those 6 foods do you consider inhumane if not shark's fin soup?
Summation: If they take out a big cleaver and chop the thing's head off, everyone would be cool with it.Really? Like I understand the cultural differences with regards to what is considered an acceptable source or type of meat between the east and west, but I would be genuinely surprised if most people in the east were completely aware of how sharks are finned and genuinely did not give any shits about it re: it being an inhumane method of farming. The comparison with dogs isn't great since killing dogs for food isn't usually considered cruel per se, just that in the west it's usually considered SUPER HORRIFYING to eat animals that are primarily used as pets. It's not an attitude I agree with, honestly... unless people's pets are literally being stolen to be cooked, but I seriously doubt that's the case. I don't even think this could even be compared to whaling, though the environmental effects are probably similar (I'll admit I don't know much about the cruelty aspects of whaling though). It's just that the whole thing is sort of similar to chopping off the feet and tail of cattle and then leaving them hobbled in a field somewhere to starve to death. Even for people who are happy to eat beef, that sort of shit probably wouldn't fly.
I guess my main question is do you guys think most people who are living where shark's fin soup is culturally significant don't give a shit about the methods in which they're farmed? Are the methods generally unknown and would probably cause more controversy if people knew, is it considered a necessary evil or is it just more like if someone was beating the shit out of a shark with a bat until it died they wouldn't care because animal cruelty is no big deal and leaving a shark to starve or drown in the bottom of the ocean isn't really cruelty anyway? And to you specifically jynx, which of those 6 foods do you consider inhumane if not shark's fin soup?
Traditionally there weren't any waste for sharkfins though. People use the shark meat for adding flavour to fish balls.Summation: If they take out a big cleaver and chop the thing's head off, everyone would be cool with it.
That's really what all you're saying comes down to.
Afterwards, the "waste" of focusing on the fins-- to me, there's always going to be waste. Whether you're eating 10% of the animal or 60%, it's really no different from an ethical perspective; you're just accessing a food resource, with powers of demand put to work on the market. The Chinese have possibly the oldest culinary culture in the world, with knowledge of more ingredients than likely any other. If there was a use for shark meat that would be widely demanded, I think they'd know.
I mean, if we talked about crayfish-- Crayfish are said in French culture to have excellent brains/shells that can produce a bisque finer than lobster bisque. But the edible meat is probably only the small amount of tail muscle that can be easily popped out-- seriously about 10% of the animal. And yet, the vast majority of Crayfish you'll see eaten in China and the Southern US (probably the two biggest consumers) are not being used to be smashed down into good soup, but boiled and stacked up to easily pop out and eat that tail meat-- same with all the crayfish tail meat dishes you'll see in Britain and "cajun pasta" served across the US. Does that really bother me? Not really.
The "suffering" of the shark could be an ethical issue, but that just means that if we were to build a highly regulated and honest industry of shark finning, we'd have them bring cleavers (and some large cleaving device for the bigger sharks).
Thanks for the info Jynx-- that's supply and demand at work.Traditionally there weren't any waste for sharkfins though. People use the shark meat for adding flavour to fish balls.
But times have changed, and the African countries supplying the fins don't want to supply the rest of the shark.
I'm actually allergic to prawns and other crustaceans.I will eat most types of foods from pretty any cuisune, but for some reason I cannot eat any type of shellfish. Even my stereotypical Australian 'prawn on the barbie' actually makes me throw up right there on the spot, and don't get me started about the time I was tricked into eating lobster meat; I blew chunks all over my plate and the immediate vicinity.
I love fusion foods as well.I don't know why fusion gets such a bad rap. There are many dishes I love that might constitute as "fusion".
.