I'm really looking forward to it to. Would love to see George stay in the Front RowCan't wait to today's race anymore! I'd love to see Russell score more points for Williams and Ricciardo having a good race after all this time. And, as always, go Alonso!
I really went into the race thinking we'll have another Zandvoort but I was wrong. The race was really exciting and I was very happy for McLaren. I remember last year when Sainz barley missed it. Also the saga of Ham vs. Ver continues.Best race of the season today? Felt it had everything ngl
Unfair ngl, Giving the same penalty as the Bottas crash seems very unfair and honestly I don’t think u can say one of the racers was entirely to blame, I would have said racing incident and moved on. What did u think?How did you find the verstappen grid penalty?
Not only that but he will get another one when he changes his Power unitUnfair ngl, Giving the same penalty as the Bottas crash seems very unfair and honestly I don’t think u can say one of the racers was entirely to blame, I would have said racing incident and moved on. What did u think?
I disagree. If you do this, then you are in effect legalizing the type of move Max made famous this year when the driver just divebombs into the corner and relies on the other guy going wide into the runoff to avoid a collision, which then sets an ugly precedent for the future.I agree, Lewis should have been made to give the position back...
You can complain about the handling of the safety car all you want, because that was handled poorly. That said, Mercedes could have used this opportunity to put Hamilton on fresh tires and chose not to; meanwhile, Red Bull made the correct call bringing in Verstappen for fresh soft tires. As a result, that led to a situation where Verstappen was on relatively fresh soft tires while Hamilton was on the same hard tires he had since lap 14. Mercedes could have easily made a decision to prevent something like this from happening and they didn't. That's on them, regardless of the safety car procedure.I disagree. If you do this, then you are in effect legalizing the type of move Max made famous this year when the driver just divebombs into the corner and relies on the other guy going wide into the runoff to avoid a collision, which then sets an ugly precedent for the future.
Lewis was robbed, plain and simple. Mercedes only dropped the appeal because dragging this drama out doesn't help them sell cars and it's hard to argue against a rule that basically says "[Masi] can make everything up and the points don't matter".
If Mercedes pits, Red Bull keeps Max out. It's a situation that happens in NASCAR all the time. If there's a restart, the leader in this situation is screwed 100% of the time. Merc made their call based on the assumption that there'd be no restart, which according to the rules, would have been a correct assumption had Masi not stuck his nose in and turned the event into WWE-on-wheels with his made up rules. It's 100% on the FIA here, not on Merc at ALL.You can complain about the handling of the safety car all you want, because that was handled poorly. That said, Mercedes could have used this opportunity to put Hamilton on fresh tires and chose not to; meanwhile, Red Bull made the correct call bringing in Verstappen for fresh soft tires. As a result, that led to a situation where Verstappen was on relatively fresh soft tires while Hamilton was on the same hard tires he had since lap 14. Mercedes could have easily made a decision to prevent something like this from happening and they didn't. That's on them, regardless of the safety car procedure.
This is a little preservationist, don't you think? Hamilton did everything he needed in the last three races to beat Max and make history, did so, only to have Masi decide "I'm going to hand the title to Max because basketball reasons".In any case, saying Hamilton was "robbed" is a little ridiculous. He already has seven world championships, tied with Schumacher (in fact, the only other people to win any titles in the 2010s were Sebastian Vettel and Nico Rosberg) and he's probably the only driver competing today who will get to be remembered as one of the greats on the level of Michael Schumacher, Jim Clark, and Ayrton Senna. I think he'll be fine without the 2021 title; he and Wolff even said they didn't want to be awarded the title in a courtroom instead of on a racetrack.
lets just disregard the whole fact verstappen got a shitload of undeserved 0s and the biggest robbery this season in Silverstone, sureThis is a little preservationist, don't you think? Hamilton did everything he needed in the last three races to beat Max and make history, did so, only to have Masi decide "I'm going to hand the title to Max because basketball reasons".
The key word here is "assumption"If Mercedes pits, Red Bull keeps Max out. It's a situation that happens in NASCAR all the time. If there's a restart, the leader in this situation is screwed 100% of the time. Merc made their call based on the assumption that there'd be no restart, which according to the rules, would have been a correct assumption had Masi not stuck his nose in and turned the event into WWE-on-wheels with his made up rules. It's 100% on the FIA here, not on Merc at ALL.
This is a little preservationist, don't you think? Hamilton did everything he needed in the last three races to beat Max and make history, did so, only to have Masi decide "I'm going to hand the title to Max because basketball reasons".
Just because I see things differently from you, doesn't make me a "dickrider". Cut that crap.but there's no need to dickride Mercedes and Hamilton, bro
They actually couldn't have unlapped in 56, as there were still marshals on track there.also the last lap restart was fine, the process of unlapping wasn't (should have given the unlap order at lap56/57 and restart the race there),