Look at column B, the one with Mafia Rolecop. How could ANYONE corroborate? The only possible answer is a counterclaim.
So, if not her, then you?
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
NOC eli loves matrices game thread [Game Over, Town Win!]
- Thread starter Nuxl
- Start date
Continued from above: or, did I miss an inflection there? That is, are you claiming a role that verified her, or was there an if Vizh, then her that I missed in the mess of everything?
I think schia is implying they're the even-night tracker
town prs should just claim at this point i think?
If Schia is, then that's a sweep right now and there's no reason not to say it outright.
Fair
maybe i'm just misinterpreting
well. the reason to say is to confirm schias claim
the answer is pretty simple. I wont say yet
You misunderstood. I was saying that Schia should say outright and either be uncontested or else counter-claimed.
The question was sarcastic. It's IMPOSSIBLE for someone to corroborate results. Only for an odd tracker to confirm they exist, thus proving the even tracker exists due to column B only having a single cell that has odd tracker (which also has even), and there being only one scum left so no more than one mafia could be involved in such a claim, and the claim requiring at least two people.
Hold on, I re-read the matrix. Two cells with Odd Tracker.
my thing is like. if the odd track comes forward, as long as someone else isnt coming forward claiming jker or even track, we can more or less treat schia as confirmed right? therefore their results can be trusted/corroborated
you're floppy btw
regardless it's just ls > schia unless schia is pulling some nightmare play here
which frankly schia doing this as scum is a bit silly and unnecessary. so like.
vote ls
caff your new pfp is so scary
Schia, realiti, and psy all on LS. That's 3/5 for hammer. Please no more votes, until Schiavetto has a chance to respond re any reasoning. I especially want reasoning because I townread LS, between her D2 start and D2 EOD.
Yes so let's vote
I said before, but: If Schia is a power role that can 100% condemn and LS is guilty, then a hardclaim is auto-win for us. If Schia isn't, then I trust LS enough that I distrust this vote and want more time to talk over everything and not just Schia being really suspicious of LS. And since Schia being a PR with a hardclaim is a 100% win for us, there is no reason not to claim, so I mistrust the assumption that Schia's a PR.
There's other ways to phrase this and it involves a bit of nuance. I've often been bad at relaying nuance. If there's ambiguity in my reasoning, ask.
If Schia is lying then he is scum
If Schia is telling the truth LS is scum
Either way we do LS -> Schia and win
I'm casting doubt on those posts having been a claim for certain.