Ever since the release of Platinum, there have been three CAP Pokemon that for one reason or another dropped out of favor. These are the first three – Syclant, Revenankh, and Pyroak. The first two of those were originally deemed broken; they were revised to their current states. Pyroak has never been revised; however, a wide variety of factors has contributed to it seeing little use. Here at CAP, we'd like to see all of our creations to see frequent use, so we're thinking of giving these Pokemon a bit of a buff.
This is the thread in which people may apply for membership on the CAP Revision Committee.
The CAP Revision Committee (CRC) will consist of recognized CAP players and its members will hold the responsibility of voting on the revisions to the first three CAP Pokemon. The CRC will also discuss the subject at length with the general public.
Although the CRC is not a popularity contest, all users should note that we will most likely be turning some applicants down. However, anyone with an established history of active involvement in the CAP project and on the CAP server, that has the desire to serve on this committee, is likely be selected. Server activity will be heavily weighted when we select the CRC members.
The selected CRC members will be invited to our private group; the voting process will be conducted there.
This thread is strictly for candidacy posts. Do not post support for the candidates, since this is not a public poll. This is not a discussion topic about the Revision Committee, so please do not ask questions about it here. If you have an issue concerning this, contact tennisace, Plus, or myself privately.
Rules:
This is the thread in which people may apply for membership on the CAP Revision Committee.
The CAP Revision Committee (CRC) will consist of recognized CAP players and its members will hold the responsibility of voting on the revisions to the first three CAP Pokemon. The CRC will also discuss the subject at length with the general public.
Although the CRC is not a popularity contest, all users should note that we will most likely be turning some applicants down. However, anyone with an established history of active involvement in the CAP project and on the CAP server, that has the desire to serve on this committee, is likely be selected. Server activity will be heavily weighted when we select the CRC members.
The selected CRC members will be invited to our private group; the voting process will be conducted there.
This thread is strictly for candidacy posts. Do not post support for the candidates, since this is not a public poll. This is not a discussion topic about the Revision Committee, so please do not ask questions about it here. If you have an issue concerning this, contact tennisace, Plus, or myself privately.
Rules:
- Candidates must have been actively involved in the CAP forum and or on the CAP server, especially over the past two most recent CAP projects (CAP 8 and 9). Voting is not "active involvement". Lurking is not "active involvement". You must have a strong track record of making intelligent posts and contributions to the project. Active playtesting on the CAP server is a highly valued contribution to this project.
- You must have a clear understanding of the CAP process and rules.
- Make application posts only. A sure-fire way to prove that you do not understand CAP rules is to go off-topic in this thread. Do not suggest other people.