Search results

in

in

in

i take ownership and responsibility of the decision, it was my call, lmk if there's an issue

great job tyrants. you won it against all odds with your two best players (ipl and ctc) getting banned. in the aftermath of those decisions you showed a stunning and complete competitive mentality and it paid off in the end.

gl to the kong boys

I don't dislike the idea of changing up WCOP's format. It doesn't feel knee-jerk at all to me, either, because we've had a few iterations with this format. It seems pretty consistent that people aren't Particularly Thrilled with All CG OU. I'm not sold on what the replacements should be but...

idle death gambits is a fucking sick team name btw

We had our first game today, two players I think are extremely strong in Kaz and Troller. We are sort of getting to the point where Troller's performance is just unheard of, 40-15 (~73% win rate) is just completely nuts particularly over that number of games (there are a few people with "better"...

in

in

good luck to the Wolfpack and to the Tyrants, both teams whom have a lot of people that i like

in

The TD team need a community liaison that isn't directly responsible for decision making to interface with the broader playerbase. And (I know this will be taken as a joke, but it isn't meant to be one) it should be me. It is not the easiest task in the world to be Generally Cool with most...

have no fear my friend i have signed up

they should have made it bo1 again at the end, that would have been by far the funniest option.

User name: teal6 Tiers NOT Played (binding) None Tiers Preferred (not binding) SV OU, SM OU, RBY OU Time Zone GMT-5

I think we can all agree that this issue has been contentious, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't look for solutions. If some players want BO3 and some players want BO1, why don't we split the difference and go with BO2 for this SPL?

confirming

won vs pikachuzappyzap, gg https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen7ou-735778